Foreign buyers remain unfazed by hefty property taxes

Australian property — both commercial and residential —remains attractive to foreign investors despite major tax barriers when entering the market, according to an expert. 

HLB Mann Judd Melbourne partner Josh Chye stated that investor demand from markets, including Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia, remains strong and, if anything, has been increasing.

“New enquiries from mainland Chinese investors have scaled back significantly but other parts of the Asia Pacific region, including Singapore and Hong Kong, are consistently strong and Australia remains an attractive jurisdiction despite the relatively high taxation rates,” he said.

He explained that Australia’s relatively high taxation rate — both at a personal and corporate level — has served as a major deterrent for some investors looking to get into the country’s property market. 

For perspective, the Land Down Under’s personal tax rate of 47 per cent is almost double Singapore’s rate of 22 per cent. This disparity is more evident when compared with Hong Kong’s rate of 17 per cent.

 

Adding to foreign investors’ pain, Mr Chye explained: “We also have higher than average tax costs for foreign buyers of real estate than our global neighbours, including on land tax.” 

“This has increased consistently over the past seven to 10 years at both the state and federal level, and the additional impost is a burden for foreign investors in real estate.”

The lack of consultation with industry players regarding the tax hikes in the last decade has led to some foreign buyers becoming “concerned and frustrated” with property transactions in the country, according to Mr Chye.  

“When these buyers look to acquire a project, the numbers they put in might change and the costs for stamp duty or land tax may significantly – and unexpectedly – increase,” he said.

But while the high tax rates in the country continue to have a major bearing on buying decisions, Mr Chye said that this is offset by Australia’s status as a beacon of stability for real estate investors. 

He also noted that the strong price growth across the country — particularly in Sydney and Melbourne has also driven interest from foreign buyers. 

“Prices have increased significantly over the last 18 months and there’s still no doubt Australia and its major cities are a huge attraction for foreign investors whether it be for business or personal reasons,” Mr Chye stated. 

And while he acknowledged that China has significantly scaled back its presence in the local market, he expects a rebound in the coming months. 

“The recent harsh lockdown restrictions in China have created more interest in investing here. The key challenge is not the desire but the ability for foreign capital to be physically transferred here, as certain countries have tightened their controls around money leaving the country,” he said.

Mr Chye said the current uncertainty in global markets is also unlikely to dampen interest in Australian property assets.

“Inflation and interest rate increases are common across the globe so if rates go up, it will put pricing pressure on property, however, the demand will still be there. 

“The pricing pressure will be global so from that perspective, it should not detract from investors looking to acquire Australian property assets,” he said.

However, the expert also raised awareness about potential events that could upend this trend. 

“[If] there continues to be a trend of continued tax increases or removing of tax concessions solely focused on foreign investors, this will no doubt hurt Australia’s reputation and standing as a stable jurisdiction for foreign investors into Australia,” he warned. 

He further cautioned that this would make other markets such as the US, Canada and the United Kingdom will increasingly look more attractive as alternative destinations for real estate investments. 

Two home loan features can save big money but are widely misunderstood

There are two main facilities on a family home loan that should exist in anyone’s tax planning toolbox. Unfortunately, they are often misunderstood or improperly used.

Variable home loans are generally more likely to offer features like an offset account or a redraw facility, which are two alternative options that help homeowners reduce their mortgage repayments.

Both tools have contributed to the record rate of debt repayments seen across the country.

Bankwest, for example, said that in March 2022, more than 90 per cent of customers were ahead on their home loan repayments. The average months by which customers were ahead (around three years), increased by 45 per cent.

Their data showed a huge uplift in the volume of savings put into home loan offset accounts. From June 2019 to March 2022, offset account balances grew by 63 per cent – nearly triple the rate of personal savings growth for the period of 23 per cent.

The surge in home loan repayments was matched by a rapid uptake in new home loan offset accounts linked to an eligible home loan, enabling households to use existing savings to reduce their current home loan balance.

Comparison researchers Canstar found that all variable rate home loans and a majority (61.7 per cent) of fixed rate home loans offer a redraw facility.

Canstar analysis of the owner-occupier and investment home loans found that the vast majority of variable rate loans (93.7 per cent) – along with over one-third of fixed rate loans (35 per cent) – offer a full offset account.

So, what exactly are these two, often misunderstood but common, home loan features?

Offset account

This is a standard bank account that is linked to your loan account. The offset account will normally be with the same financial institution as the mortgage provider.

The offset account effectively reduces the loan balance by the amount of money in the offset account, thus reducing the interest component on the monthly loan repayment. This only works with variable rate loans, not fixed rate loans.

This is an ideal location for your emergency cash-float and where your salary or income should be deposited.

The money in an offset account is technically your money, not the bank’s or an early loan repayment. This means that if you take money from the offset account to buy an income producing asset like shares, the interest charged on that purchase cannot be claimed in your tax return.

Purchasing investment assets in this way keeps the loan with its original use, being the family home, not the new asset purchase and the interest not a tax deduction.

So, the main benefit of an offset account compared to an ordinary transaction account is that the money you put into it is ‘offset’ daily against the balance of your home loan, and interest is charged against this reduced amount, rather than the full outstanding balance of your home loan.

Redraw facility

The redraw facility provides the ability to pay down your home loan mortgage in advance and at any time while the loan is active, and then withdraw some or all the amounts paid in advanced.

The act of redrawing alters the usage of the withdrawn amount into a new loan, secured against the family home but assigned to its next use.

If the next use of that money is to generate taxable income, then the interest cost on that new loan (redrawn) amount is tax deductible and ‘good debt’.

If the redrawn amount was used to buy a boat or go on a family holiday, which do not produce taxable income, then the interest cost on this new loan is not tax deductible, and the new loan is considered ‘bad debt’.

The family home, or as we like to refer to it, ‘The Lazy Uncle’, can utilise the redraw facility to maximum advantage.

This works during periods of low interest rates where the cost of borrowing is less than what can be earned by investing in tax advantaged assets, like Australian shares, investment properties or interest-bearing investments, such as fixed interest bonds.

By using the redraw facility and structuring the new loans into sections of variable and multi-year fixed rates for peace of mind and repayment stability, a tax planning strategy starts to emerge where additional cashflow produced can help with:

  • accelerated reduction of the family home loan
  • additional income to support living expenses
  • additional superannuation contributions.

When it comes to funding early, semi or full retirement, using the redraw facility and putting the ‘The Lazy Uncle’ to work is an effective tax planning strategy to consider well in advance of leaving full employment or paying off the family home loan too soon.

Offset account or one-off lump sum repayment into a redraw facility: impact with a $500,000 loan at 3% over 30 years

Offset/redraw amount at start of loan Total interest paid over life of loan Interest saved
$0 $258,887
$5,000 $251,677 $7,210
$10,000 $244,640 $14,247
$20,000 $231,070 $27,817

Source: Canstar. Based on a $500,000 loan with an interest rate of 3%, repaid over 30 years with principal & interest repayments. It is assumed that the offset account balance is kept constant at the specified amount for the entire loan term, or alternatively that the lump sum repayment of the specified amount is made at the start of the loan. Calculations do not take into account any fees that may apply.

Regardless of which strategy is adopted, any extra money paid off on a mortgage or kept in an offset account could save a significant amount in interest in the long run.

But features such as an offset account or redraw facility, as well as refinancing in pursuit of a better deal, can also add costs to a home loan in the form of additional fees or a higher interest rate and may have tax implications, so it’s always worth seeking professional advice to identify the best approach.

Auctions set records, attract higher prices

 
Auctions have netted sellers an extra 11.7 per cent more under the hammer than if they’d accepted the highest offer prior to auction.

The national property auction market has broken all records for the first few months of the year, while also notching up the busiest ever Easter week of activity.

CoreLogic’s Quarterly Auction Market Review revealed that 23,748 homes went under the hammer in the first three months of 2022, making it the busiest March quarter since records began in 2008.

For comparison, there were 19,004 capital city homes taken to auction in the first quarter of 2021 and 18,902 over the March 2020 quarter.

During the three months to December 2021, 42,918 homes went to auction, setting a new benchmark and carrying through to an earlier than usual pick up in this year’s auction volumes CoreLogic Research Director Tim Lawless said.

However, the combined capital city clearance rate of 69.9 per cent for the March 2022 quarter was down from the December result of 71.3 per cent and weaker again when compared to the corresponding quarter in 2021 when the clearance rate was 80.0 per cent.

“The first quarter of the year saw the trend in auction volumes and clearance rates heading in different directions,” Mr Lawless said.

“While the number of auctions held reached a March quarter high, the clearance rate gradually drifted lower through the quarter.”

As demand becomes more thinly stretched, lower clearance rates on higher volumes were a normal trend, Mr Lawless said.

Data released by the Ray White Group showed that auctions were favouring sellers over buyers.

Over the past year, Ray White auctions have netted sellers an extra 11.7 per cent more under the hammer than if they’d accepted the highest offer prior to auction. 

Ray White Adelaide recorded the largest gap, with auctions selling 13.6 per cent more than the highest offer prior, closely followed by regional Australia at 12.3 per cent. Ray White auctions across Melbourne and Sydney weren’t far apart at 11.4 per cent and 11.3 per cent respectively. In southeast Queensland, Ray White auctions sold under the hammer for 11.2 per cent more than the highest offer prior on the Gold Coast, while in Brisbane the number was 10.3 per cent. 

Ray White National Special Programs Director Bianca Denham said the auction method worked well for sellers for a few reasons. 

“A great auction agent knows they need to build competition and gather as many bidders as possible,” she said.

“Auction has always been regarded as the truest measure of market value and given the results we’re seeing at auction day, almost 12 per cent above highest offers prior to auction, our sellers are being rewarded. 

“Keeping the property in the market for three to four weeks, allows all active buyers to see the property and maximises the competition on auction day. 

“We very rarely hear vendors who sell by auction lamenting whether they could have got more, it gives great peace of mind that you have extracted the best money the market will pay.” 

Clearance rates

Higher overall listing numbers and a slowing rate of sale in Sydney and Melbourne had impacted market conditions early in April but picked up towards the end.

Sydney’s auction clearance rate over the March quarter was 69.1 per cent, compared to 69.9 per cent over the previous quarter, and 84.5 per cent over the March quarter 2021.

There were 8,283 auctions held in Sydney in the first three months of 2022. But for the week ending on Wednesday (27 April), the New South Wales clearance rate was back up to 81 per cent.

Overall, Melbourne’s clearance rate was recorded at 68.5 per cent over the March quarter, down from 69.7 per cent over the previous quarter and 77.5 per cent over the March 2021 quarter. In terms of auction volume, there were 10,315 homes taken to auction across the city over the March quarter.

Ror the week ending on Wednesday, the Victorian clearance rate was up to 79 per cent.

Of the smaller capital city markets Adelaide was the top performer with a clearance rate of 80.6 per cent for the March quarter from 1,797 auctions (89 per cent for week ending 27 April). Canberra recorded a clearance rate of 77.9 per cent from 1,227 auctions (85 per cent this week) and in Brisbane 1,916 homes went under the hammer resulting in a clearance rate of 67.9 per cent (68 per cent this week for Queensland).

“With such strong selling conditions, we’ve seen a progressively larger portion of homes being taken to auction in Adelaide; a city that has historically favoured sales campaigns by private treaty rather than auctions,” Mr Lawless said.

Easter is traditionally one of the quietest auction periods of the year and generally marks the start of the winter selling season.

Although this year’s Easter week was the busiest on record with 937 homes taken to auction across the combined capital cities, Mr Lawless predicted the trend would be for fewer auctions in the coming months.

“This is a seasonal trend we see through the winter months, but as selling conditions gradually swing towards a buyer’s market, we could also see clearance rates trending lower,” he said.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR
NEWS and UPDATES